Open Meetings Law Executive Session Violations
The bill creates a right for a local public body to cure a violation of the open meetings law with respect to an executive session if the local public body takes the corrective action at its next meeting after the meeting at which the violation occurred or at the local public body's next meeting that is held at least 14 days after receiving notice by a person who intends to challenge the violation. The bill requires that, in order to have standing, a person who intends to challenge a violation of the open meetings law by a local public body in connection with an executive session must first provide notice to the secretary or clerk of the local public body and the parties must meet or communicate before the next meeting of the local public body to determine if the challenge can be resolved without filing with the court. If the local public body cures the violation, a person does not have standing to challenge the violation. However, if a local public body in connection with an executive session commits a third violation the same nature within a one-year period, the local public does not have a right to cure the violation.
Under current law, if the court finds a violation of the open meetings law, a prevailing citizen is entitled to costs and reasonable attorney fees. If the court does not find a violation, the prevailing party may recover costs and reasonable attorney fees if the court finds that the action was frivolous, vexatious, or groundless. The bill provides that for certain challenges by a pro se plaintiff that are brought in connection with provisions governing executive sessions in the open meetings law, the pro se plaintiff is not entitled to an award of costs or attorney fees. The bill also creates an additional allowance in connection with a challenge filed that concerns an action by a local public body for an executive session to allow a local public body to recover costs and reasonable attorney fees if the court determines the person filing the challenge has not complied with the notice requirements or that the local public body has cured the violation.
(Note: Italicized words indicate new material added to the original summary; dashes through words indicate deletions from the original summary.)
(Note: This summary applies to the reengrossed version of this bill as introduced in the second house.)