CLICS/CLICS2022A/commsumm.nsf
PUBLIC
BILL SUMMARY For HB22-1059
HOUSE COMMITTEE ON STATE, CIVIC, MILITARY, & VETERANS AFFAIRS
Date Mar 21, 2022
Location LSB A
HB22-1059 - Postponed Indefinitely
|
|
|
02:25:38 PM |
The committee came
back to order.
Representative Soper, prime bill sponsor, presented House Bill 22-1059,
concerning a requirement that any bill that imposes, increases, or authorizes
the imposition of a fee be approved by a two-thirds vote of all members
elected to each house of the General Assembly to become law. The bill requires
that certain bills must be passed by a two-thirds vote of all members on
final passage in each chamber of the General Assembly. The two-thirds
vote requirement applies if the bill:
- imposes a new
fee;
- authorizes the
imposition of a new fee;
- increases an existing
fee; or
- authorizes the
increase of an existing fee.
|
|
02:29:46 PM |
Representative Soper responded to questions from the committee.
|
|
02:30:26 PM |
Angel Merlos, representing The LIBRE Initiative, testified in support of the bill.
|
|
02:32:57 PM |
Cameron Hill, representing Colorado Common Cause, testified in opposition to the bill.
|
|
02:35:23 PM |
Joshua Carver, representing Americans for Prosperity, testified in support of the bill.
|
|
02:37:08 PM |
Maud Naroll, representing
the League of Women Voters of Colorado, testified in opposition to the
bill.
Written testimony was submitted to the committee (Attachment B).
|
|
02:39:45 PM |
Representative Soper made concluding remarks about the bill. Committee members commented on the bill.
|
02:47:25 PM
|
Motion |
Refer House Bill 22-1059 to the Committee of the Whole. |
|
Moved |
Bradfield |
|
Seconded |
Woog |
|
|
|
|
Amabile |
No |
|
|
Bacon |
No |
|
|
Bernett |
No |
|
|
Bockenfeld |
Yes |
|
|
Boesenecker |
No |
|
|
Bradfield |
Yes |
|
|
Neville |
Yes |
|
|
Valdez A. |
No |
|
|
Woog |
Yes |
|
|
Woodrow |
No |
|
|
Kennedy |
No |
|
|
|
YES: 4 NO: 7 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: FAIL |
|
|
02:47:45 PM
|
Motion |
Postpone House Bill 22-1059 indefinitely using a reversal of the previous roll call. There was no objection to the use of the reverse roll call, therefore, the bill was postponed indefinitely. |
|
Moved |
Woodrow |
|
Seconded |
Valdez A. |
|
|
|
|
Amabile |
Yes |
|
|
Bacon |
Yes |
|
|
Bernett |
Yes |
|
|
Bockenfeld |
No |
|
|
Boesenecker |
Yes |
|
|
Bradfield |
No |
|
|
Neville |
No |
|
|
Valdez A. |
Yes |
|
|
Woog |
No |
|
|
Woodrow |
Yes |
|
|
Kennedy |
Yes |
|
|
Final |
YES: 7 NO: 4 EXC: 0 ABS: 0 FINAL ACTION: PASS |
|
|